Figuring Out Why This Tesla Hit That Truck

9. Vel 2021.
1 468 990 Pregleda

Thanks to Omaze for sponsoring today's episode! You could win a 2018 DODGE DEMON and $20,000 cash through Omaze! ENTER:
As of 2020 Tesla has logged over 3 billion miles of autonomous vehicle driving. That’s over 120,000 laps around your momma. Like it or not, we can all agree that autonomous vehicles are the way of the future. Tesla, Cadillac, BMW, they're just a few companies that have cars on the market with autonomous features. But each of them tackle this "autonomous driving" problem in a different way using different technology. So how do they do it, how does it really work, and more importantly, is a computer in a car truly as responsive as the human brain? Well today we are gonna find out. Skynet is here.

New to the Channel?
►Watch this:
We upload almost every day, subscribe so you don't miss out!
►Subscribe here:
Click here for more info on joining the Donut Underground!
Shop Donut Merch:
Donut Media is at the center of digital media for the next generation of automotive and motorsports enthusiasts. We are drivers, drifters, and car enthusiasts who love to tell stories.

  • Auto-pilot makes irresponsible bad drivers... change my mind

    Zachary JonesZachary JonesPrije 3 minuta
  • Best way to avoid colisions: learn how to drive and pay attention when you are driving.

    Ron GrooveRon GroovePrije 37 minuta
  • Elon forgot to put an else { Stop(); } statement in his A.I.

    Guacamole PoggerGuacamole PoggerPrije 4 sati
  • Why discard one system? why not use them all?

    Andy SmytheAndy SmythePrije 4 sati
  • I love how the clips of tesla systems saving lives don't get seen but 1 freak accident is shown around the world

    NickZeroNickZeroPrije 5 sati
  • He just explained how autopilot car senses surrounding.. nothing about why the tesla hit..i thought i wasted my time here coz I know these stuff... Butttttt i never knew that gooogle image Captcha was fuckin machine learning initiative 😂

    Portgas D AcePortgas D AcePrije 5 sati
  • From the video of the Tesla crash into the truck you can see that the brakes were deployed briefly and perhaps the actions of the driver interfered with that deployment. It looks as if there are other factors that need to be investigated.

    derrill yagerderrill yagerPrije 5 sati
  • Food for thought: 1) The truck was on it's side at an angle to the Tesla. Radar works by bouncing signals off objects and then it times the return signal to determine distance. If the signal does not return, then the RADAR is blind to an object. The reason the F117 Nighthawk stealth fighter has sharp angles is to bounce signals away from the RADAR receiver thus making it stealth. So in this case, just like looking at an image in a mirror, any RADAR bounce from the RADAR sender was probably scattered to the left and right of the Tesla due to the sharp angle of the roof and back door of the truck. 2) The top (and probably back) of the truck was probably all white, or some other mono-chromatic color. The cameras on the Tesla may have reacted as if it were driving into a white horizon. It probably saw it as nothing in it's way but a clear sky over a hill top.

    David LatkaDavid LatkaPrije 7 sati
  • Answer: The driver wasn't paying attention as he should, autopilot or not.

    DeeshDeeshPrije 9 sati
  • That Tesla was moving at a good clip. Can't tell id it was speeding, but if those trucks were doing the speed limit, that Tesla was by far exceeding their speed.

    Michael BravoMichael BravoPrije 11 sati
  • shameful clickbait a waste of 11 minutes of my life

    Tim LeckTim LeckPrije 13 sati
  • 10:33 , TESA MODEL 3 great proofreading !

    aimdgs87aimdgs87Prije 14 sati
  • The guy in the road could have messed with the Tesla’s system. Like it saw a person in the road and that was it’s primary focus and didn’t have enough time to analyze the truck

    That One GuyThat One GuyPrije 16 sati
  • I just watched this entire video for nothing.

    myla mahinaymyla mahinayPrije 21 sat
  • Radio has LONG wavelengths? Really?... try dividing the speed of light by the radar frequency to see how long of a wave you get...

    Jesús RodríguezJesús RodríguezPrije 22 sati
  • 4:38 this is true, however you can detect objects with radar by analysing the returned signal since different objects have different signatures. This allows you to train a machine learning model to detect what object is being defected by the radar. For instance this technology is used in submarines

    Tiago OliveiraTiago OliveiraPrije 22 sati
  • The computer dont know someones right there dead

    Majestic stevensonMajestic stevensonPrije 22 sati
  • WTF If you don't know the answer why make this video! Wasted my time

    Amujao NaoremAmujao NaoremPrije 22 sati
  • autopilot can't override the drivers actions, if he had his foot of the pedal it would have went full on even if it knows it'll crash and if you crash in a Tesla you would have crashed anyways

    ZeroTwoZeroTwoPrije dan
  • 4:38 - had I sipped my scalding coffee one second later it would have come out my nose. close call... careful out there coffee drinkers

    Lucas KLucas KPrije dan
  • In fact there was breaking but long before the car hit the semi if you look carefully when the car gets to that object that could be a person you see burn out like smoke emanating from it's tires.

    what kenyanwhat kenyanPrije dan
  • Still on the driver tbh. Elon needs to stop telling people they can rely completely on autonomous vehicles

    EV VanceEV VancePrije dan
  • This reminds me of the time a Tesla crashed into a crossing truck, because there was too little contrast difference between a white truck and the sky in the background. I suspect this might have been a similar case? Although that doesn't explain why Tesla wouldn't have built in a self-check, aka "if the road (lane markers etc.) is missing in the picture, assume the camera is faulty, listen to your other sensors and disable autopilot", which while yes, is complicated, that really should be done...

    peter müllerpeter müllerPrije dan
  • Car guys: "This is why we like out steering !!"

    SwarajSwarajPrije dan
  • A 12 minute video for an idk? Wtf

    The Great FoodiniThe Great FoodiniPrije dan
  • For everyone whos watching the video for the answer... he didn't have one and it's a click bait

    Yazeed AlateeqYazeed AlateeqPrije dan
    • 🤨

      SkipptkSkipptkPrije dan
  • not the 1st time a Tesla plowed itself into a truck, Tesla "autopilot" isn't a true autopilot but just a gimmick to sell cars to ppl who don't know better...

    dunhillsupramk3dunhillsupramk3Prije dan
  • Elon is right. LIDAR is a crutch. Obviously this wasn't the fault of optical sensors or you wouldn't see the truck on camera, because it wouldn't be detected by the camera; Obviously this isn't true. The thing that failed was the AI interpreting the information from the sensor rather then the type of sensor. The reason why LIDAR is a crutch is because you'll need optical sensors anyway to provide the AI with enough context to have some extent of situational awareness. And once an AI has situational awareness it doesn't need LIDAR anyway. LIDAR is a pitfall.

    TauTauPrije dan
  • lmao this was 100% the drivers fault... he should have seen that semi at least from 200 metres. not a tasle fanboi btw. that driver should lose his license.

    Robin BinderRobin BinderPrije dan
  • The reason the Tesla’s RADAR system wasn’t able to discern the truck as a stationary object was because of the angle it was facing. RADAR requires a return signal and it’s the reason why stealth planes like the F-117, F-22 and the F-35’s are able to avoid radar is because they deflect the radar return away from the detectors that are supposed to pick up the signal return. The truck was at an odd angle so the radar just bounced off it as it wasn’t there. As for the camera system not picking it up, it was more than likely not trained to recognize that situation and kept on trucking. The fault comes down to the idiot driver that was in the car, just because you have auto-drive doesn’t mean the car is fully autonomous, we just aren’t there. There is a reason you are warned to always keep your hands on the wheel and your eyes on the motherfucking surroundings, auto-drive is an aid not a replacement for the moron sitting in said Tesla. So he can fuck himself and stop blaming Tesla for his fucking mistake, although Tesla needs to put more emphasis on stopping idiot drivers think that their cars can literally drive themselves. I drive a Honda Accord that has the lane keep assist system coupled with the Adaptive Cruise Control and I love them because they allow me to momentarily take my eyes off the road for a moment when I need to do something that requires my immediate attention and be certain that the car will stay in its’s lane and I won’t rear end the car ahead of me if it decides to slow down momentarily. These are tools that are meant to make the drivers life easier, but in no fucking way are they a replacement for an attentive driver looking at their surroundings and be ready for anything. The days of autonomous driving are at least a decade or more away, until then, keep your fucking hands on your wheel and your eyes on a goddamn swivel unless you want to end up like this fucking moron running into an overturned truck.

    Jose MartinezJose MartinezPrije dan
  • The traditional autoindustry has had fully autonomous cars with complete autonomy for 30 years. LITERALLY 30 YEARS, you see, they work with the military industrial complex and the first driverless car, with brain of a goddamn stealth yet made its maiden voyage from Dover to Paris with out a single driver input, in 1986. They have class 6 fully autonomous cars in testing, have had for over 15 years now. THEYRE JUST NOT STUPID ENOUGH TO SELL IT, BECAUSE THEY DONT WANT TO KILL PEOPLE. Also, they're in the business of making _CARS_ for _DRIVERS_ not robots to replace ride-share and cab drivers. AND THEY DO SELL IT IN CARS IN APPLICATIONS WHERE IT COUNTS LIKE IN THE MERC S-CLASS AND VOLVO HEAVY TRUCKS WHERE THEIR _RADAR_ ENUMERATION AND OBJECTDIFFERENTIATION SYSTEMS _ENHANCE_ DRIVER CAPACITY NOT DRIVE INTO STATIONARY THINGS, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT GADGETY BULLSXHIT! Besides which, if you want an electric car that doesn't seize and fucking burn it's battery to shit in artic conditions, BUY A VOLVO OR A POLESTAR! MUSK IS A PUSSY AND JUST CANT DO IT!

    Meton12765Meton12765Prije dan

    Edward EvansEdward EvansPrije dan
  • Actually, you're wrong. Radar echo object differentiation and enumeration has been a fucking thing since the goddamn 1960's and with ECM package of the A-12 and later the SR-71. And it's literally a non-issue to fit necessary modern day far more sophisticated computing power and DSP magic into a car. The Merc S-class; LITERALLY DOES. Instead of wasting it's time with selling unsafe, unreliable in tough conditions, poorly built fashion items with gadgety nonsense that nobody wants like non-car-industrialist Musk there. No wonder Apple is making a car... They can sell anything badged with their shit to idiots in California. Here in the real world, we actually build cars that don't fucking crash into literal inanimate objects BUT ACTUALLY HIT THE E-BRAKE FASTER THAN PEOPLE! Volvo fucking runs it's HEAVY TRUCKS WITH RADAR EMERGENCY BRAKING IN _HIGHWAY_ SPEEDS. So, yeah. IT'S YOU WHOSE FUCKED MUSK. STOP BUILDING BULLSHIT AND TRYING TO SELL HIPSTER CRAP TO REAL PEOPLE! And if you want to make a fucking robo-car with no driver. Fuck off, Boston Dynamics does it with LIDAR. So, there.

    Meton12765Meton12765Prije dan
  • Elon is now teaching the AI by running tesla cars to an overturned trucks. He now destroyed 600 models and is now in 4th generation

    Noju KuramuNoju KuramuPrije dan
  • Rogan is making Elon very stupid

    BrainDebtBrainDebtPrije dan
  • the tesla submarine would have saw that truck trailer

    Galen HanesGalen HanesPrije 2 dana
  • Fun video. Awesome humor.

    Michael VerhoefMichael VerhoefPrije 2 dana
  • You are incorrect about a radar notification having a high resolution. Do some digging. However....they would not be practical in an automotive application 😋.

    wamp wampwamp wampPrije 2 dana
  • And why the hell was someone just standing there on the freaking highway

    Heime101Heime101Prije 2 dana
  • Eventually autonomous cars won't be able to all rely on individually observing the environment and navigating through it solo. I can see a future where cars are interconnected and act as a swarm. Informing a local group of cars of impending danger ahead and even reacting to potential accidents as one to avoid a pileup. Every car on the road could be aware of one another and anticipating accidents rather than just reacting to them. All while operating at the limit of the cars capabilities in an emergency situation. Elon Musk will also likely be the biggest opponent of communication standardization between cars when the NHTSA comes knocking because it will erase a lot of Teslas moat they've built for themselves.

    Zach RoweZach RowePrije 2 dana
  • Tesla's are slamming brakes on because they see cattle grids on the roads as walls... ☠️😂

    Paul CurranPaul CurranPrije 2 dana
  • Can we just talk about how the tesla went straight into a truck a full page and the dude was fine

    The DIY ShopThe DIY ShopPrije 2 dana
  • "Why the Tesla hit the truck? I don't know." Seriously??? The question is the title What was this video about? I didn't even expect you to know, the exact answer would be the Holly grail of machine learning. But I expected something - data, analysis, guess, anything. Maybe you could re-upload this with a little more content because otherwise it's good quality.

    Zoltán BorosZoltán BorosPrije 2 dana
  • But how did the truck crash

    Franky ValdebenitoFranky ValdebenitoPrije 2 dana
  • Pov:ur blind

    Reapy BoiReapy BoiPrije 2 dana
  • One objection sir, Toyota uses both lidar and cameras, for example my dad's chr doesn't allow for adaptive cruise and self driving in low visibility conditions because the cameras can't see and therefore can't interpret the objects, so I guess a combination of radar, lidar and cameras would be ideal

    Riccardo SartoriRiccardo SartoriPrije 2 dana
  • driver wasn’t paying attention

    Taylor TurkTaylor TurkPrije 2 dana
  • Obviously, the combination of sensor inputs was something the AI had never seen before. Right? WRONG! If the AI had never seen it before, _it would have slowed down._ The fact that the car did not slow down meant the AI was confident. NOTE: Did you notice the puff of smoke as the car passed what appeared to be the truck driver standing by the side of the road? The car did not slow down for an obvious pedestrian except for a brief momentary brakes lockup (puff of smoke). I'm leaning towards there was a malfunction in the car autonomous systems. *Here ae some other factors regarding the truck (although the pedestrian should really raise the questions.):* SHAPE OF TOP The truck was on it's side showing it's top to the car. If the top was smooth, it could have been mistaken for a bridge which has smooth sides and can cross the road at a similar angle. COLOR OF TOP The color of the top of the truck, its reflectivity, sun angle, etc. could have created something unique - in fact it would be possible for a combination of these make the truck top have the same color as the road which would really be confusing. ANGLE OF TOP It is possible that the angle of the top was such that it reflected the radar away from the transmitter. Early Corvettes were know to have extremely small radar cross-sections because of their angled radiator. Stealth tech is based around let's call it a critical angle - found by Russians in the 30's. If you look at all the angles on F-22 edges, you'll see this angle everywhere. ANGLE + RADAR = Bad if you're unlucky. RELATIVE VELOCITY OF TOP Stationary so could be mistaken for bridge. I wouldn't be surprised that vehicles begin to carry transponders to help autonomous vehicles. Even RFID in license plates.

    Nofer TrunionsNofer TrunionsPrije 2 dana
  • 10:16 actual discussion of accident after 10 minutes of autonomous car technology discussion.

    Nofer TrunionsNofer TrunionsPrije 2 dana
  • 10 years in the future will be looking back at this thinking that humans were the weak point in driving while someone simultaneously hacks the system and drives us all into each other. 😁

    Ab RenosAb RenosPrije 2 dana
  • Tell your gf, bf, w/e to take it easy on your eyebrows next time. Looks like your ready to put on your night dress and hit the town. Girls night!!!

    Slagg CSSlagg CSPrije 2 dana
  • So why did the driver fail to detect they were driving strait into a wall

    Cheesey McCheeseCheesey McCheesePrije 2 dana
  • I think the main reason the car hit the truck is because the driver of the car was not doing his/her job, DRIVING! wake up, dont sleep while driving!

    Dan LuckinsDan LuckinsPrije 2 dana
  • I’m sorry but chubby Thor with the short hair on this channel is funnier. Use him

    AljalilAljalilPrije 2 dana
  • What's with mom thing?

    Bharath TonyBharath TonyPrije 2 dana
  • Any road? Challenge accepted! You're obligated to fly out here if I get hospitalized! SEE YOU ON MONDAY!

    Matty PuppyMatty PuppyPrije 2 dana
  • 10:32 ohno not tesa

    Elias RohdinElias RohdinPrije 2 dana
  • Lidar can definitely *not* detect if a person is wearing a helmet at any reasonable distance. Have you ever seen a proper visualisation of a Lidar measurement? It's essentially a 360° distance map, but the pixels (measurements) are very sparse, It's notoriously difficult to make sense of.

    w0ttheh3llw0ttheh3llPrije 2 dana
  • I like Elon but sometimes I can't agree with him

    Bhaskar NoobBhaskar NoobPrije 2 dana
  • I don't doubt that tesla has "blackboxes" built into their cars, not nefariously, but for troubleshooting and development. If the person had lied and the car was on manual mode, tesla would have openly broadcast the findings of that. Ergo, the car was in AI mode at the time leading up to the crash. If I was to wager a guess, I'd say the AI likely mistook the trailer as an overhead sign and fog. When it got close enough for other sensors (ultrasonics etc) to see that it was detecting a much more solid object, then it finally braked, but was (appropriately set to be) too conservative about the swerving through traffic.

    Andrew StambaughAndrew StambaughPrije 2 dana
  • - crash merging into the same lane as another vehicle Tesla's camera failed to see that both cars entered the same lane and should have backed off. - Texas is snowed in and no electricity = tesla sucks - tesla using up tons of batteries. smartphones for the billions of people are more important than a few rich people in a tesla. To answer your question "who in their right mind buys a car without test driving it?": crazy Tesla owners I'm glad I test drove the Tesla model 3 because I thought it sucked (large turning radius, overly aggressive regenerative braking felt like I slammed on the brakes, stiff ride due to high psi tires, road noise, ugly center stack screen with tiny fonts).

    mrpmj00mrpmj00Prije 2 dana
  • 12:18 A bit off topic, but the ipod was a pathetic piece of sh*t. I have a Casio Cassiopeia E-125 from year 2000, it came out a year before the first ipod, it has a huge backlit color touchscreen, solid state storage with the compact flash card slot, has a jog dial that can shift through music as fast as Apple's sh*tty wheel. Meanwhile the first ipod didn't come out until 2001, had a crappy tiny black and white screen that looks like a gameboy from the 80s, had all kind of harddrive issues because it had a mechanical harddrive, it was a piece of garbage like Apple products still are today. I've even say the Zune is better than the ipod, even thou the Cassiopeia is the best of the three.

    Sleepless EngineerSleepless EngineerPrije 2 dana
  • 6:06 that is such a stupid statement, it's obviously way more important to have something safe and reliable than something that doesn't look "ugly"

    Sleepless EngineerSleepless EngineerPrije 2 dana
  • 10:22 what was on the road you can see smoke/ dust coming from under the tesla as there was gravel or sand

    Wassim DibWassim DibPrije 2 dana
  • It hit the truck because they used the MCAS system from the 737 MAX.

    Funny farm 555Funny farm 555Prije 2 dana
  • 06:15 looks like they are paying google drivers to do nothing now

    чкюьдэт Арлижх вомалйтэцчкюьдэт Арлижх вомалйтэцPrije 2 dana
  • He wasted our time

    Vervito UnitedVervito UnitedPrije 2 dana
  • Tesla just overrated the tech just normal with fancy names

    Tiaro YousantTiaro YousantPrije 2 dana
  • At minute one, wondering if this brings up LiDAR's issues in the all too common occurrence of rain... 5:57 okay good

    Colin KozlovichColin KozlovichPrije 3 dana
  • All these autopilot sensors wreck havoc on my radar/laser detector. Lol!

    FortisProcerFortisProcerPrije 3 dana
  • 4:39 dont watch at full volume

    Sam HollisSam HollisPrije 3 dana
  • Pulse Doppler Radar. VERY simplified: Stationary objects create no doppler for the pulse from the radar to measure, so it's invisible. This is a very well known effect and used by jets to avoid being locked on to by enemies

    Robert BorjessonRobert BorjessonPrije 3 dana
  • Wtf, who tf r u? What is this shit? Where are the real Donut guys?

    Alex O.Alex O.Prije 3 dana
  • when people rely on technology too much, this is the result. remember this next time you hail a self driving UBER.

    Rain ManRain ManPrije 3 dana
  • Or maybe the camera was dirty

    CudaCudaPrije 3 dana
  • So we didn't figure out why this happened.......

    VenomTTVenomTTPrije 3 dana
  • Wow,Plain simple,I say 100% drivers error.He had to have sleeping.

    Russell LarsonRussell LarsonPrije 3 dana
  • No content, no funny jokes, pos presenter and no cool cars. CLICKBAIT

    NPC VirtuousNPC VirtuousPrije 3 dana
  • Also would the human have been able to avoid the crash if he had been paying attention? If you notice he didn't slam on the brakes until he was right next to the guy standing on the side of the road...?

    Doc TylerDoc TylerPrije 3 dana
  • To me, It’s plain as to why the Tesla hit it and the driver didn’t see it. Neither one looked. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 The Tesla was looking at a cute Porsche. The Driver was asleep. Just my opinion. Lol Tesla should have used a Truck Monkey as backup!!!

    Darvin PreeceDarvin PreecePrije 3 dana
  • That guy standing there by the median was jamming the lidar causing the wreck. It’s why it’s a fools errand.

    James Von BlitzaJames Von BlitzaPrije 3 dana
  • because the driver was distracted

    Adrian MartinezAdrian MartinezPrije 3 dana
  • Zoon Zoom Zune

    Ariady PutraAriady PutraPrije 3 dana
  • It also just really unlikely this Tesla was in autopilot at all. It didn't even flinch with a person standing directly in the lane until AFTER it had passed that person, and the AI is absolutely trained to compensate for a human standing in the path of travel. The driver was just lying to get out of liability.

    Gordon ChristopherGordon ChristopherPrije 3 dana
  • Tesla's can be hacked and hijacked.

    Kiran felixKiran felixPrije 3 dana
  • The better question is... Why tf didn't the driver do something

    INDI GOINDI GOPrije 3 dana
    • He was too busy virtue signaling on Twitter

      Carlos SantosCarlos SantosPrije 2 dana
  • it was trump mistake behind car crash

    INDI GOINDI GOPrije 3 dana
  • *Sideways Semi Truck in the road. An Over Pass.....Computer "Same Thing". Me: How do I turn all of this "Tech" off?*

    killersushi99killersushi99Prije 3 dana
  • Here is another answer.

    vagisha dasvagisha dasPrije 3 dana
  • Whoever wrote the script for this video, you're not funny

    FrappyFrappyPrije 3 dana
  • It hit the truck because it was in his way. It is just that simple.😊😶

    vagisha dasvagisha dasPrije 3 dana
  • what the world really needs is to get these goddamn idiot drivers that dont even want to be driving off the road and onto public transportation or lyfts, and get rid of automatic transmission.

    Jackie FloresJackie FloresPrije 3 dana
  • duh, the truck was on the road sideways.

    Sonic 4 Ur MindSonic 4 Ur MindPrije 3 dana
  • And what was that puff of 'smoke' when the car was still 25 feet away from the truck???

    marie chancemarie chancePrije 3 dana
    • driver finally looked up and stomped on the brakes

      Dan LuckinsDan LuckinsPrije 2 dana
  • I don't care if they answered the question or not, the content is great and the presentation is amazing coming form someone who probably group up in the hood with an IQ of 180.

    Shannon FletcherShannon FletcherPrije 3 dana
  • No mention of the person on the road and the burst of tire smoke at that point.

    Sean WorkmanSean WorkmanPrije 3 dana
  • The computer was confused when the person came so close to the front of the car and it took too much time for it to regain its bearings. Picture you driving down the freeway and seeing a person standing very close to the road, you are wondering what they're doing and focusing on them. Spend too much time doing that, and you won't see what is beyond them soon enough.

    Tom ThumbTom ThumbPrije 3 dana
  • Driver must be sleeping to not see that truck and shut down the autopilot.....

    Eduardo RivEduardo RivPrije 3 dana
  • If you trust a robot car to drive you around, you'll end up in a truck

    MaJieMaoMaJieMaoPrije 3 dana
  • Let’s just face the fact that human beings are getting lazier by the minute. So what, you can’t even bother to drive your own damn car or at the very least keep your eyes on the road ??

    Voice LuckanVoice LuckanPrije 4 dana